Help First Time Author Publish His Research

Welcome to what could be the most in depth exploration into the true nature of reality that has ever been attempted. Our combined scientific progress to date over the last few millennia is astounding yet we struggle to answer so many remaining mysteries. After forty plus years of study and research into as many of the different inconsistencies that science has failed to thoroughly explain, I believe I have come across a single cohesive set of theories that explains many of those inconsistencies and offers a way to help visualize what The Universe looked like before our universe was born.

Mysteries that seem to unravel at our feet when we toggle one single assumption that lies at the heart of nearly all scientific disciplines. When we start with a premise of eternal time and infinite space and examine what general relativity, special relativity, and quantum mechanics tells us we should expect, it is not inflating bubbles, hot dense centers of quantum fluctuating cold dark matter, nor singularities.

A simple union between general relativity and special relativity tells us something very profound that can no longer afford to be overlooked. Apply the field equations of general relativity against eternal time and infinite space and instead of inflating bubbles we get nested pockets of spacetime.

This fact is already well observed inside our visible universe. Pockets created because celestial bodies playing follow the leader(s) create pockets of spacetime where siblings sharing the same base relative trajectory and relative velocity would share in the same base perception of time and space. A perception that is unique to each body or gravitationally bound group of bodies since their own perceptions of that base reality changes due to all gravitational fields acting upon them and their relative velocity inside their shared parent comoving frame of reference.

Could a revised computer simulation provide the holy grail of astronomy and actually solve all these issues concurrently, a feat that no simulation has yet been able to come close to accomplishing : The nature of dark energy, the likely nature of dark matter, the nature of space and time themselves, where all the mass came from, the horizon problem explained without needing inflation, the baryon asymmetry problem, the "axis of evil" anomalies, supervoids, superfilaments, the CMB, galaxy formation, small scale structure questions, density of satellite galaxies, the approximate 50/50 split of clockwise and counterclockwise galactic rotations across all three dimensions, supermassive black holes, mature early galaxies, large quasar groups, cosmic filament spin, ultra-diffuse galaxies, globular clusters, disparate quasars sharing the same relative angle of inclination, disparate galaxies sharing the same relative angle of inclination, disparate galaxies sharing the same relative rate of rotation, the shape of the universe, the age of the universe, the fine-tuning problem, the cusp-core problem, the flatness problem, the multiverse question, possibly the lithium problem, the crisis in cosmology with the Hubble tension, the vacuum catastrophe, blue transients and high energy cosmic waves, and red transients and their potential to unlock far more answers than any other cosmic phenomena?

I say yes. I say that a hot dense center assumption made over a century ago has outlived its usefulness and we are on the precipice of a paradigm shift that challenges that starting condition. In doing so I propose that simple changes to our best simulations can begin replicating dark energy and big bangs at our scale factor.

Instead of starting with an assumption start with just the data we have collected and then apply that against a simulation that can better approximate eternal time and infinite space. With a randomized recursion of larger comoving frames of reference or varying relative mass all following general relativity we begin to see the true structure of our universe evolve. Then apply the nature of orbital mechanics matching our observations of moons moving away from planets and planets moving away from stars and stars moving away from their central black holes and eventually seeing the approximate diameter of our local groups orbit around the great attractor slowing increasing in size as the basic diameter of the local group also slowly increased in size.

Apply those orbital mechanics to the recursive nature of parent comoving frames of reference and we see general relativity will manifest dark energy due to the dissipation of massenergy cohesion across a succession of nested pockets of spacetime.

When our simulation is fairly accurate then I predict one inconsistency after anomaly will fade from concern as the computer simulations continue to get better and better at accurately showing us all the different items we have been observing that do not match the model of a hot dense center

Help me publish my essays and improve my podcasts and for the first 42 who pre-order the limited first edition hard-cover signed and numbered copies of my first essay, “On The Natural State Of Nature’, you will also get a hard-cover limited edition signed and numbered copy of the follow up essay, “On The Human State Of Humanity”.

Can three changes to the field equations of the ge

DR JM NIPOK