Fund for Justice

Gofundme for justice is to fund people denied justice by lack of funding.

The fund will be a permanent fund for victims who have successfully defended a vexatious court action and has a 100% case and will be a grantee for a civil action to seek damages. Solicitors need to know they will be paid if the action fails. All payments will be subject to transparent accounting.

The fund will only be for legal and associated cost. If successful the cost will be returned to the fund and shortfall of cost to be made up from damages if possible or reasonable that the fund then be available for eligible applicants who give this undertaking and have suffered injustice qualifying them for help.

I was assaulted with a vexatious court action and was fortunate to get legal aid and successfully defended it. Legal aid is a façade for justice it prevents injustice but the fact you are legal aided means you do not have the fund to seek recourse via the court.

I was quoted a cost of £10K which I believe is an average cost of a court case and the amount I hope to raise or exceed which would give solicitors confidence to act.

Six properties applied for planning permission my application was refuse. I contend this was discrimination and the result of a long running dispute I had with the council.

I have registered a formal complaint with the Home Secretary Ms Priti Patel without a satisfactory result to date

My hope is to finale get justice and prevent others suffering as I have that I can spend what time I have left I am 73 with Archie piebald rescue horse companion for Maverick ( reg: Captain Flack) 16 hands 3 through bread. The building behind them is to be replaced with my proposed dwelling. I have to be at the stables 365 day twice a day for morning and evening feed I never miss. I am forced to live else where I rent a room to sleep.

I contacted the architect who submitted my application with regard to an appeal. He was advised by an appeal consultant he uses that he would make the appeal for me that it would cost more than a thousand pounds that there was little or no chance to succeed and gave no reason.

1. The council has designated my property as agricultural which prevents any development. An appeal would not and dose not have the authority to re designate my property as a brown field site as I claim my property is. The crown court will make a judgement on this the council making the claim of agricultural land can not be justified as it has not been agricultural for over one hundred years, this burdens my property and is discrimination, my claim my yard is a brown field site can be justified which I am confident will be up held by the court.

.

2. An appeal will not consider the fact I have been in dispute with the council since the early eighties. I applied for permission for stables business this was refuse I have one and a half acres which is a field and incorporates a brown field site my yard.

At the same time number nineteen the plot of land next to mine was granted permission for a dwelling on agricultural grounds. This was gained by telling a pack of lies it also came to my attention that the owner of nineteen seventeen and fifteen had built an extension on to number seventeen and obtained planning permission for an extension to number fifteen both extensions were on my property, I complained to the council but was dismissed out of hand. The only recourse was expensive court action which I could not fund.

At a latter date number eleven applied for planning permission for an extension on my property despite my objections the council acted as judge and jury and gave permission to build I took this up with Andrew Lansley my MP at the time and got nowhere despite a court judgment showing me as the owner.

At a later date number fifteen decide to help them self to more of my property and encroached onto my property. Unable to afford a solicitor and being a strait forward matter I took legal action my self. I put every thing that had happened from the start of my dispute up to date before the court and was successful and granted me a restraint order over my property. His Honour circuit Judge Elly stated that it was a definitive judgement that had my objection and complaint been dealt with at the time I would have retained and recovered my property.

The crown court will consider my contention my planning permission refusal was because of my continued complaints about the council and was the motive for the refusal.

Unwilling to accept in justice and unable to afford litigation I pursued my complaints with Ms Thatcher MP Mr Tony Blair MP Mr Ashdown MP and all the Lord Chancellors from when Blair took power until Mr Clark MP without success.

3. an appeal will not consider the fact my planning consultant contacted Cambridge council and stated I wanted to put a caravan on my yard a Brownfield site as a utility for the stables that it did not need planning permission and quoted high court judgments to that fact but that I would applied for any permission they required. We were required to fill in a form which we did and heard nothing further. I put my caravan on the site only to be accused of putting an illegal dwelling on the site a criminal offence. They took court action and demanded a fifty thousand pound fine. I contested this myself unable to afford a solicitor. Their action failed and was heard by three judges.

This should have been the end of the matter. Instead they brought the same action again demanding fifty thousand fine again. Concerned I was going to be stitched up I requested it be heard in crown court. At court I stated I knew the difference between right and wrong and what the law was that I was not competent or qualified to present my case. I was awarded legal aid and told to get a solicitor and barrister.

There was no trial the council claim I was a criminal by putting an illegal dwelling on my property was thrown out of court.

The crown court will consider my contention that this action was a result of my continue quest for justice and was motive for my planning refusal.

4. an appeal will not consider the fact six property effectively the same applied for planning permission five were granted a total permission for five detached four bedroom houses two detached three bedroom bungalows and one two bedroom detached bungalow three detached garages and two blocks of stables.

They refused my two bedroom bungalow. This is blatant discrimination and is a contradiction to a president set by the permission granted to the other five properties. And also contrary to the council letter sent to local properties which stated the only grounds for objecting to my application would be on the grounds of noise or pollution!? The crown court will consider my contention and I believe will uphold my claim for damages and loss

5. an appeal will not consider the fact my original application for stables was refused as un suitable while granting permission for a dwelling number nineteen on agricultural grounds now they give permission for two houses and stables to number 19 while refusing me permission for a dwelling say my property is agricultural this is totally illogical outrageous discrimination which the crown court will pass judgement on.

I swear this is the truth the hole truth and nothing but the truth

F T Passarelli